• Summer 2021 Qualifying Exams are approved as fully remote exams, but may be held in-person, by request, with the option for one or more (by exception) remote committee member(s).
• Fall 2021 Qualifying Exams are expected to be held in-person with the option for one or more (by exception) remote committee member(s).
• For Summer and Fall 2021 QE's only, Graduate Studies will review requests for more than one remote members in an approved in-person QE, but only in exceptional circumstances.
• QE's held after Fall 2021 will be conducted in person with the option of one remote committee member.
More information on the timeline and processes is available on the Return to In-Person Qualifying Examinations webpage.
QE Report Form: Report on Qualifying Examination for Admission to Candidacy
Committee and Student Attendance at the Qualifying Examination
It is the responsibility of all committee members to be in attendance for the entire qualifying examination. Unanticipated or unavoidable absence will be explained in detail by the Chair in the report on the outcome of the examination, and a specific plan for completion of the examination within 72 hours by all members of the committee will be detailed.
In the event that the Chair is absent, the remaining members of the committee shall suspend the examination after waiting a reasonable time, and after attempting to contact the Chair. In this case, the Chair will report the results as ‘No Exam’ and explain the circumstances in detail. The examination shall then be rescheduled and conducted in the same manner and format as intended for the original examination.
If a student is not present at the time of the scheduled Qualifying Examination, both the committee chair and the student must submit written reports explaining the circumstances to Graduate Studies. The Administrative Committee of the Graduate Council will review the case, and rule on whether the student’s absence constitutes a failed examination or if a rescheduled examination should take place.
Adjourning the Qualifying Examination in Process
Under unusual and extenuating circumstances, as determined by the committee, the committee may suspend the qualifying examination in process, and may request that the exam be considered a ‘No Exam.’ If the committee wishes to suspend the exam, the chair must return the Report on Qualifying Examination indicating ‘No Exam’ along with an explanation to Graduate Studies.
The members should endeavor to reach a unanimous decision as to the qualifications of the student for successful completion of a doctoral program. They should include in their evaluations of the student such factors as relevant portions of the academic record, performance on specific parts of the examination, and an overall evaluation of the student's performance and potential for scholarly research as indicated during the examination.
A committee, having reached a unanimous decision, shall inform the student of its decision. If a unanimous decision takes the form of ‘not pass’ or ‘fail’, the Chair must include in their report a specific statement, agreed to by all members of the committee, explaining its decision, and must inform the student of the decision. See results section below for more information on required statements. The decision of a unanimous committee may be changed only for cause, e.g. procedural error or probable bias.
If after deliberation, the committee is unable to reach a unanimous decision concerning a pass, not pass, or fail, the chair shall inform the student that the committee is divided. Chairs of divided committees must inform the student that the majority and minority are making recommendations, that the recommendations will be subject to further review, and that the Administrative Committee of the Graduate Council or its designee will make the decision as to future action. The chair must notify the Dean of Graduate Studies that the Committee is divided and shall forward to the Dean separate reports from the majority and minority of the committee with their specific evaluations of the student's performance on the examination and recommendations for further action by the Administrative Committee. The Administrative Committee may, at its discretion, request individual statements from members of the examining committee and will consider a written statement from the student if one is submitted. While the deliberations of the examining committee are confidential, student records, such as written reports from committee members, are available to the student by law.
Results of the Qualifying Exam
Results of the Qualifying Exam committee vote should be reported using the ‘Report on Qualification Examination for Admission to Candidacy’ form attached to the Chair’s QE approval email from Graduate Studies. Report forms should be returned to the student’s Senior Academic Advisor at Graduate Studies by the QE Chair or the Program Coordinator (not the student). Any report other than ‘Pass’ must be accompanied by additional documentation. All decisions must be communicated to the student immediately following committee deliberation.
Pass: The committee unanimously decides the student passed the examination and is prepared to continue towards the doctoral degree and advance to candidacy. No conditions or additional requirements may accompany this decision.
Not Pass: The committee unanimously decides the student did not pass part or all of the exam, and must address deficiencies through reexamination. In the case of a ‘Not Pass’ decision, the chair of the committee must inform the student verbally and in writing, with a copy sent to Graduate Studies along with the exam report, assessing the student’s performance on each subject area covered during the examination. The statement must specify if the committee will re-examine the student on all topics or only on those not passed in the first exam. The committee determine and identifies the format of the second attempt (an oral examination, a rewriting of the proposal, writing additional papers, retaking the entire exam), the details (i.e. time to present, length of paper,etc.) and provide the student a detailed timeline.
Fail: The committee unanimously decides the student failed the examination, and the deficiencies were so substantial that the student may not continue towards the doctoral degree. A unanimous fail on either the first or second exam is a recommendation of the student’s disqualification from the degree objective. In the case of a 'Fail' decision, the chair must notify the student verbally and in writing, with a copy sent to Graduate Studies along with the exam report, assessing the student’s performance and deficiencies in the examination. If for a first exam, the statement should explain why reexamination is not recommended by the QE committee.
The Qualifying Examination can be a stressful experience for the student, especially in the case of a ‘Not Pass’ or ‘Fail’ result. Consider whether the student might benefit from consultation with other faculty and staff advisors or with a mental health professional (530-752-2349); see Mental Health and Counseling Services.
Reporting the Results of the Second Qualifying Examination
After a second exam a decision of ‘Not Pass’ is not allowed – only a decision of ‘Pass’ or ‘Fail’ will be recognized. Only one retake of the qualifying exam is allowed. In the case of a decision of ‘Fail’, the student will be notified verbally, and the report form must be submitted to Graduate Studies along with written evaluation of the student’s performance and deficiencies of the second examination.
If the chair or committee members have questions or concerns prior to or after the Qualifying Exam, contact the student’s program’s Senior Academic Advisor at Graduate Studies.
If after reviewing the Qualifying Exam regulations, questions remain during exam proceedings, immediately contact the Graduate Studies office during business hours, (530)-752-0650, to discuss the situation with a Senior Academic Advisor.